Meeting Minutes
NCLA Governmental Relations
Committee Meeting
March 4, 2002
10:30AM to 12:00NOON
D.H. Hill Library, NC State University
Present: Annis Barbee, June Brotherton, Kevin Cherry, Peggy Hoon,
Nancy Gibbs, K.T. Vaughan, John Via.
1. Membership Update
New members:
Annis Barbee, paraprofessional, NCSU Libraries
KT Vaughan, NCSU Libraries Fellow, Scholarly Communication
Departing members:
Deanna Harris, public school librarian
The committee reviewed the current membership and discussed strategies
for increasing representation on the committee both geographically
and by type of library. Current membership represents primarily
academic libraries, public libraries, and the state library from
the Triangle, Triad, coast, and mountain regions. The committee
would like to include school libraries, community college libraries,
and have other regions of North Carolina represented. The committee
felt that recruiting through networking was still the best route
although soliciting from the NCLA membership at large and the executive
board was also acceptable.
2. National Library Legislative Day
ALA's National Library Legislative Day this year is May 6th and
7th. We are in the process of scheduling the appointments and have
secured a room in Rayburn for a luncheon from 12 to 1:30 p.m. on
the 7th. The committee then discussed recruitment for the North
Carolina contingent. Again, the need is for school librarians, community
college librarians and geographical diversity.
The committee would like to investigate bringing NCLIVE mementos
to our reps this year.
3. Federal and State Issue Development
Federal
In years where the committee has determined that there are issues
specific to North Carolina libraries (issues that deviate or are
in addition to the identified ALA issues), the committee would like
to explore taking non-librarians with us to Washington, D.C. on
Library Legislative Day. It was felt that finding non-library partners
supportive of library issues, such as community leaders, business
persons, or the school superintendent, who would be willing to lobby
our federal congressional representatives with us, could be very
effective. Various ways of soliciting funding for their travel from
local businesses and organizations was also discussed.
However, since time is short and we have no such North Carolina-specific
issues identified, it was decided that we would primarily follow
the ALA recommendations for issue discussion at Library Legislative
Day.
State
The committee decided that it would like to be more pro-active at
the state level and develop a plan for advancing selected issues
of importance to all libraries in North Carolina.
The committee will develop a process for supporting a specific issue
through the vehicle of a specific issue selected this year. Although
several issues important to libraries in North Carolina were discussed,
the committee felt that increased support of NCLIVE was at the top
of the list. It is perceived that many legislators as well as the
populace at large do not fully appreciate the richness and importance
of NCLIVE to all of the libraries in North Carolina and, consequently,
to all of the citizens of the state. This lack of appreciation may
result in cuts to the funding for NCLIVE in this time of severe
budget cuts.
The preliminary "proposed" plan for state level issue
development is:
o Draft a resolution in support of NCLIVE and seek NCLA Executive
Board approval
o Create an "issue packet" containing:
1. The NCLA Executive Board resolution
2. Background sheet on NCLIVE
3. Question for a local supporter [to be used to ask legislator/candidate
when election-cycle town meetings begin; committee to draft local
supporters to attend these town meetings]
4. Sample follow-up letter for legislator/candidate
5. Sample letter to the newspaper
o Other ideas include: contacting various groups in the state for
support such as the League of Women Voters, Farm Bureau, interested
local businesses, etc. Local sponsors could carry the issue to county
or district party conventions possibly presenting a resolution to
a local party platform.
o Coordination with NCLIVE is important.
o Investigating how much is spent per citizen for NCLIVE compared
to similar initiatives in Ohio and Virginia
o Develop a list of questions that can be answered through resources
available in NCLIVE.
Kevin Cherry is to draft the NCLA Executive Board Resolution. The
committee adjourned requesting a follow-up meeting in mid-April
with a telephone conference hook-up that would allow participation
by geographically distant committee members.